Comments for Medical Connectivity http://medicalconnectivity.com Mon, 20 Feb 2012 01:42:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Comment on Medical Implant Communications Service Tutorial by Gregory W Cox http://medicalconnectivity.com/2006/03/03/medical-implant-communications-service-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-4862 Gregory W Cox Mon, 20 Feb 2012 01:42:12 +0000 http://medicalconnectivity.com/2006/03/03/medical-implant-communications-service-tutorial/#comment-4862 Dear Sir, This doesn't sound like your jurisdiction , but if someone doesn't do something about a situation that is allowing terrible privacy violations, and violating pretty much every civil and human right promised by almost every country, then you'll just be another agency , force , department, coalition, or bueau that I've tried to contact to report being operated on without my consent and torchered using what appears to be classified technology. I have a denied freedom of information act and privacy act request from the CIA denied sighting executive order 12958 as the reason for denial, I have a letter from the inspector general at the department of justice refering me to the inspector general at the CIA for the same complaint I'm mentioning today, and after calling I was refered to some kind of hotline That didn't give me any kind of insight into the matter. It appears that the coersive approach to mind control is has been used on me, another tactic developed by CIA, I have some drawings that appear to be some kind of remote veiwing type drawings since this started , another CIA developed tactic,after returning home shortly after this started I found a different screen saver on my computer, and several cia sights in the browsers hystory. Please , if some one invaded your body, violated you sexually , and messed with your head for over seven years, tryed to harm you by engineering an obstruction and placing it in front of you car on the freeway. You would hope there would be some one willing to help you. Not preempt your complaint with crazy accusations so you won't come back , or mention real crimes happening with technology anybody can look up US pattents on. I'm lie detector test cirtain I was implanted with some kind of bioelectronics interfacing device at the Cherry Park Adventist Hospital on OCt 31 2005 in south east portland oregon. And Since then whom ever is responsible for implant number 4154271 hasn't been very nice. Related frequencies seem to be 316.500000 and 359.275000 . This is proof enough isn't it? 503 infront of the 4154271 reverse locates as a t-mobile land line to the house where I started staying right after I got the implant then after talking about it and emailing a few people about it the reverse locate moved to the middle of a bridge, our governments intel guys if that is who is on the other end love that symbolism, especially the got you by the balls one. . . I hope that is enough said. all I'm asking for is removal of the implant, if there is no way to be compensated for seven years of torcher or justice for what has happened please help me lose the implant. could arrangements be made for a va hospital to scan me head to toe, how about ohsu up here in portland. The folks doing this to me are pretty effective at manipulating situations , especially bad ones, this situation has cost me a fortune in losses and money spent trying to protect myself. is there a federal division that really oversees these types of problems? Is there a way to get rid of the implant in an off the record type of way? I've lost seven years of my life to this device and the manipulation tactics that it is being used for. if you made it this far , thank you for your attention, I'm greatful for any help or insight you can offer, Gregory Wayne Cox 5142 SE 86th AVE Portland Oregon 97266 503-446-9851 Dear Sir,

This doesn’t sound like your jurisdiction , but if someone doesn’t do something about a situation that is allowing terrible privacy violations, and violating pretty much every civil and human right promised by almost every country, then you’ll just be another agency , force , department, coalition, or bueau that I’ve tried to contact to report being operated on without my consent and torchered using what appears to be classified technology.

I have a denied freedom of information act and privacy act request from the CIA denied sighting executive order 12958 as the reason for denial,
I have a letter from the inspector general at the department of justice refering me to the inspector general at the CIA for the same complaint I’m mentioning today, and after calling I was refered to some kind of hotline That didn’t give me any kind of insight into the matter. It appears that the coersive approach to mind control is has been used on me, another tactic developed by CIA, I have some drawings that appear to be some kind of remote veiwing type drawings since this started , another CIA developed tactic,after returning home shortly after this started I found a different screen saver on my computer, and several cia sights in the browsers hystory.
Please , if some one invaded your body, violated you sexually , and messed with your head for over seven years, tryed to harm you by engineering an obstruction and placing it in front of you car on the freeway. You would hope there would be some one willing to help you. Not preempt your complaint with crazy accusations so you won’t come back , or mention real crimes happening with technology anybody can look up US pattents on. I’m lie detector test cirtain I was implanted with some kind of bioelectronics interfacing device at the Cherry Park Adventist Hospital on OCt 31 2005 in south east portland oregon. And Since then whom ever is responsible for implant number 4154271 hasn’t been very nice. Related frequencies seem to be 316.500000 and 359.275000 . This is proof enough isn’t it? 503 infront of the 4154271 reverse locates as a t-mobile land line to the house where I started staying right after I got the implant then after talking about it and emailing a few people about it the reverse locate moved to the middle of a bridge, our governments intel guys if that is who is on the other end love that symbolism, especially the got you by the balls one. . . I hope that is enough said.

all I’m asking for is removal of the implant, if there is no way to be compensated for seven years of torcher or justice for what has happened please help me lose the implant.
could arrangements be made for a va hospital to scan me head to toe, how about ohsu up here in portland.

The folks doing this to me are pretty effective at manipulating situations , especially bad ones, this situation has cost me a fortune in losses and money spent trying to protect myself.

is there a federal division that really oversees these types of problems? Is there a way to get rid of the implant in an off the record type of way? I’ve lost seven years of my life to this device and the manipulation tactics that it is being used for.

if you made it this far , thank you for your attention, I’m greatful for any help or insight you can offer,

Gregory Wayne Cox
5142 SE 86th AVE
Portland Oregon 97266 503-446-9851

]]> Comment on Monitoring Currently Unmonitored Patients by theresa http://medicalconnectivity.com/2007/03/12/monitoring-currently-unmonitored-patients/comment-page-1/#comment-4860 theresa Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:49:35 +0000 http://medicalconnectivity.com/2007/03/12/monitoring-currently-unmonitored-patients/#comment-4860 Please tell me how many patients can be monitored with safety by one tech/ RN per 12 hour shift? Please tell me how many patients can be monitored with safety by one tech/ RN per 12 hour shift?

]]> Comment on The IOM on EHRs by William Hyman http://medicalconnectivity.com/2011/11/09/the-iom-on-ehrs/comment-page-1/#comment-4849 William Hyman Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:45:45 +0000 http://medicalconnectivity.com/?p=1655#comment-4849 More from Kevin Pho’s blog this time by Margalit Gur-Arie on the current (poor) state of EHRs including questionable benefits, cumbersome and slow, based on old technology, lacking usability, expensive, and resulting in loss of productivity. http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2012/01/adopting-ehr-treating-cancer.html More from Kevin Pho’s blog this time by Margalit Gur-Arie on the current (poor) state of EHRs including questionable benefits, cumbersome and slow, based on old technology, lacking usability, expensive, and resulting in loss of productivity.

http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2012/01/adopting-ehr-treating-cancer.html

]]> Comment on Is My Product a MDDS? by Trevor Calero http://medicalconnectivity.com/2011/05/23/is-my-product-a-mdds/comment-page-1/#comment-4847 Trevor Calero Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:19:46 +0000 http://medicalconnectivity.com/?p=1522#comment-4847 Tim, Is a medical cart that houses videoconferencing equipment for telehealth considered a MDDS? Also, what about a telemedicine cart with camera, mic and other electronic peripherals? Tim,

Is a medical cart that houses videoconferencing equipment for telehealth considered a MDDS? Also, what about a telemedicine cart with camera, mic and other electronic peripherals?

]]> Comment on History of Medical Device Connectivity for CIS by James Kantor http://medicalconnectivity.com/2008/10/03/history-of-medical-device-connectivity-for-cis/comment-page-1/#comment-4837 James Kantor Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:44:26 +0000 http://medicalconnectivity.com/2008/10/03/history-of-medical-device-connectivity-for-cis/#comment-4837 I'm quite surprised you've written a history about CIS medical device connectivity without mentioning Picis - a clear leader in the field beginning in the early to mid-90's. Please write to me if you'd like more information. I’m quite surprised you’ve written a history about CIS medical device connectivity without mentioning Picis – a clear leader in the field beginning in the early to mid-90′s.

Please write to me if you’d like more information.

]]> Comment on EMR Integration for Medical Devices: The Basics by Tony Castillo http://medicalconnectivity.com/2011/04/03/emr-integration-for-medical-devices-the-basics/comment-page-1/#comment-4835 Tony Castillo Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:10:20 +0000 http://medicalconnectivity.com/?p=1295#comment-4835 Hospital connectivity has never been a major issue for us since our DICOM implementation almost 10 years ago. The current struggle IS with the ambulatory market. The bulk of EMR vendors in this arena seem blind to the DICOM standards. Even if they only implemented a DICOM secondary capture (basically an electronic document scanner with the patient ID as clear text), the medical device community would have an easy way to gain basic connectivity in this market ("easy" means many would use it). There's also a wealth of open source solutions, to help EMR vendors with this solution, such as Mirth, DCM4CHE and also professional vendors such as Merge Healthcare. I fail to see why Docs who want this connectivity (I see our equipment in a lot of local cardiologists offices) wouldn't plunk down extra $K as an add on for their EMR. It would allow the floodgates of connectivity to open for many devices (versus $K for each one-off HL7 connection and $K to maintain it). There HAS to be a standard way to get into the ambulatory EMR. Whether it's DICOM, HL7 (ORU?, CDA?), or a pushed PDF file with a filename convention, a standard needs to be drawn. This basic workflow would save time lost to sneaker-netting the data (or god-forbid scanning a printout), not to mention the initial setup savings (don't forget the HIPAA issues!). Once we pass this milestone, a standardized basic "DICOM worklist" style functionality shouldn't be far off. EMR vendors: are you listening? Hospital connectivity has never been a major issue for us since our DICOM implementation almost 10 years ago. The current struggle IS with the ambulatory market. The bulk of EMR vendors in this arena seem blind to the DICOM standards. Even if they only implemented a DICOM secondary capture (basically an electronic document scanner with the patient ID as clear text), the medical device community would have an easy way to gain basic connectivity in this market (“easy” means many would use it). There’s also a wealth of open source solutions, to help EMR vendors with this solution, such as Mirth, DCM4CHE and also professional vendors such as Merge Healthcare. I fail to see why Docs who want this connectivity (I see our equipment in a lot of local cardiologists offices) wouldn’t plunk down extra $K as an add on for their EMR. It would allow the floodgates of connectivity to open for many devices (versus $K for each one-off HL7 connection and $K to maintain it).

There HAS to be a standard way to get into the ambulatory EMR. Whether it’s DICOM, HL7 (ORU?, CDA?), or a pushed PDF file with a filename convention, a standard needs to be drawn. This basic workflow would save time lost to sneaker-netting the data (or god-forbid scanning a printout), not to mention the initial setup savings (don’t forget the HIPAA issues!). Once we pass this milestone, a standardized basic “DICOM worklist” style functionality shouldn’t be far off.

EMR vendors: are you listening?

]]> Comment on EMR Integration for Medical Devices: The Basics by Medical Device Makers Still Working To Connect With EMRs | Hospital EMR and EHR http://medicalconnectivity.com/2011/04/03/emr-integration-for-medical-devices-the-basics/comment-page-1/#comment-4830 Medical Device Makers Still Working To Connect With EMRs | Hospital EMR and EHR Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:41:53 +0000 http://medicalconnectivity.com/?p=1295#comment-4830 [...] start with the ugly conclusions. From what Gee says, exporting medical device data to an EMR is a complicated mess, and neither vendors nor hospitals are likely to solve this problem anytime [...] [...] start with the ugly conclusions. From what Gee says, exporting medical device data to an EMR is a complicated mess, and neither vendors nor hospitals are likely to solve this problem anytime [...]

]]> Comment on History of Medical Device Connectivity for CIS by Mohan Madem http://medicalconnectivity.com/2008/10/03/history-of-medical-device-connectivity-for-cis/comment-page-1/#comment-4825 Mohan Madem Sun, 08 Jan 2012 02:00:40 +0000 http://medicalconnectivity.com/2008/10/03/history-of-medical-device-connectivity-for-cis/#comment-4825 Good and Useful piece of information for those who want to learn more about the history and emergence of Medical Device integration Good and Useful piece of information for those who want to learn more about the history and emergence of Medical Device integration

]]> Comment on Lessons from a Recent Recall by EMR News 19/12/2011 - News - emrupdate.com http://medicalconnectivity.com/2011/12/18/lessons-from-a-recent-recall/comment-page-1/#comment-4820 EMR News 19/12/2011 - News - emrupdate.com Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:27:34 +0000 http://medicalconnectivity.com/?p=1666#comment-4820 [...] Will Hyman: Lessons from a Recent Recall | Medical Connectivity [...] [...] Will Hyman: Lessons from a Recent Recall | Medical Connectivity [...]

]]> Comment on Medical Device Open Source Frameworks by Michael Georgiades http://medicalconnectivity.com/2009/04/16/medical-device-open-source-frameworks/comment-page-1/#comment-4819 Michael Georgiades Thu, 08 Dec 2011 16:30:46 +0000 http://medicalconnectivity.com/2009/04/16/medical-device-open-source-frameworks/#comment-4819 Having experienced scenarios where connectivity has interefered with the operation of medical devices the notion of a purely open source approach is unatractive. Saying that a commercialized open source approach with rigourous testing and controls procedures would be more appealing in terms of costs and patient safety. Having experienced scenarios where connectivity has interefered with the operation of medical devices the notion of a purely open source approach is unatractive. Saying that a commercialized open source approach with rigourous testing and controls procedures would be more appealing in terms of costs and patient safety.

]]>